Who’s Really in Charge? White House Gains Power Over Formerly Independent Financial Regulators

A new executive order extends White House control over independent financial agencies like FHFA and CFPB. Learn how this shift could impact mortgage regulations, consumer protections, and real estate

Feb 21, 2025

🐐 Join Community | 🔔 Subscribe | 🛒 Shop Easy Kits / Merch | 📢 Be a Sponsor

The Executive Order titled "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies," signed on February 18, 2025, extends presidential oversight to several independent agencies related to mortgages, banking, real estate, and title insurance. These agencies are now required to submit significant regulatory actions and budget proposals for White House review. The affected agencies include:

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)
Oversees Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Bank System, ensuring their financial safety and soundness.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
Protects consumers from unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices in financial services, including mortgages and banking.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Insures deposits at banks and thrift institutions, maintaining public confidence in the U.S. financial system.
National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)
Charters and supervises federal credit unions, ensuring their safety and soundness.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Regulates securities markets, protecting investors and maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets.
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Enforces antitrust laws and protects consumers from deceptive practices, including in real estate and financial services.
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
Charters, regulates, and supervises all national banks and federal savings associations.
Federal Reserve Board (for regulatory functions)
Supervises and regulates banking institutions to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation's banking and financial system.

These agencies play crucial roles in overseeing and regulating various aspects of the financial and real estate sectors, including mortgages, banking, and title insurance.

A Power Grab or Necessary Reform?

Mortgage and Banking Regulators Just Lost Their Autonomy—What Comes Next?

This shift could have significant implications for the real estate industry, potentially affecting regulatory stability, consumer protection, and market confidence.

Potential Negative Impacts on the Real Estate Industry:

Erosion of Agency Independence:
- Regulatory Uncertainty: The FHFA oversees entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which play pivotal roles in the mortgage market. Increased political influence over the FHFA could lead to shifts in housing finance policies, creating uncertainty for lenders, investors, and consumers. Such unpredictability may deter investment and complicate long-term planning within the real estate sector.

Diminished Consumer Protections:
- Increased Risk of Unfair Practices: The CFPB has been instrumental in safeguarding consumers from predatory lending and ensuring transparency in mortgage transactions. Subjecting the CFPB to heightened executive control could result in reduced enforcement of consumer protection regulations, potentially exposing homebuyers and renters to deceptive practices and financial exploitation.
Market Instability:
- Investor Confidence: The real estate market thrives on stability and predictability. Perceived politicization of regulatory bodies may undermine investor confidence, leading to increased volatility in housing markets. This could manifest in fluctuating property values and a potential slowdown in real estate development and transactions.

Operational Disruptions:
- Agency Restructuring: The executive order mandates comprehensive reviews of existing regulations, which could result in significant changes or repeals. Such restructuring may cause delays in regulatory approvals and create compliance challenges for real estate professionals, affecting everything from property sales to development projects.

Balanced Perspective:

While the executive order claims to enhance accountability and streamline regulatory processes, it's essential to consider the potential trade-offs. Proponents argue that increased oversight could lead to more efficient governance and reduced bureaucratic red tape, potentially fostering a more business-friendly environment. However, critics contend that compromising the independence of financial regulators may introduce political biases into decision-making processes, adversely affecting the real estate industry's stability and consumer trust.

In conclusion, the implementation of this executive order necessitates careful monitoring to balance the intended benefits of increased accountability with the need to maintain an independent and robust regulatory framework that supports a healthy real estate market.

DEEP DIVE: What Does Mr. Trump’s Executive Order Seizing Control of Federal Agencies Really Mean–and is It Constitutional?

Citations (see below)

Stay Wicked,
Cheryl

If you enjoy my writing, please support me with a clap, comment, follow, or subscribe.

🐐 Join Community | 🔔 Subscribe | 🛒 Shop Easy Kits / Merch | 📢 Be a Sponsor

**DISCLAIMER**

The Wicked Title Forum is a crowd-sourced resource. To help us keep our information current and correct, please comment below with any corrections or updates and we will update the article accordingly.

All sample forms should be carefully reviewed for federal & state regulatory and underwriter compliance.

The information provided here (including, but not limited to instructions, steps, or forms) is for general guidance and educational purposes only. I am not an attorney and am not giving legal advice. Information should not be considered legal, underwriting, or financial advice and is followed at your own risk. Readers should consult with their attorney and/or underwriter to obtain advice tailored to their specific circumstances.