🐐 New York Just Gave Old Discriminatory Covenants a Closing Problem
Illegal language in old documents was already unenforceable. Now it may need to be formally removed before closing.
Thank you to our friends, contributors & sponsors:🔒 Closinglock, 🌍 Foreign Tax CPA, 🪄Business Witch Academy, 🧱 Brickhouse Consulting, 🖊️Dotted Line Signings & Our Paying Readers
📢 Be a Sponsor
Some old deed restrictions are like ghosts in the title chain.
They have no legal power anymore. They should not be there. Everyone knows they should not be there.
And yet, there they sit in the public records, printed into old deeds, subdivision restrictions, declarations, covenants, and governing documents like some ugly little fossil from an era nobody should be preserving in the land records.
New York has now decided that “technically unenforceable” is not good enough.
Effective June 3, 2026, New York Real Property Law § 327-a creates a formal process for modifying recorded documents that contain unlawful discriminatory restrictive covenants. The law is aimed at legacy language that purports to restrict ownership, occupancy, sale, lease, transfer, use, or enjoyment of real property based on a protected class.
In plain English: if the old documents say the wrong thing, the transaction may now need more than a polite shrug and a “that’s void anyway.”
It needs a recorded correction.
Keep reading to find out:
What New York’s new restrictive covenant law actually does
Why “unenforceable” is no longer the end of the conversation
Which kinds of discriminatory restrictions title teams should be watching for
What “protected class” means under the law
When the new modification process is triggered
And why this is about to become a workflow issue, not just a historical cleanup project
🐐 About Wicked Title | 🔍 Search the Knowledge Base | 📢 Be a Sponsor
